Our dance class needs a practice recording that combines spoken counts with a generated instrumental backing. There is an audible buzz in the introduction near the cue for the first movement. Reliable counts and audible rhythmic markers matter most because people will use this to practise a sequence. I encountered remove suno artifacts while researching the buzz, and I want to evaluate any processing against that practical requirement. Before testing a processed copy, I want to define what would actually make it more useful in class. Would you compare the count-in and the first full phrase at the playback level used in class? I can keep the spoken layer identical so the backing track is the only part that changes. My listening notes would cover rhythmic attacks and the clarity of the downbeat alongside the unwanted texture. What would count as an unacceptable loss of rhythmic clarity for this kind of practice track? |
匿名
發表於 5 小時前
